Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections - Data Graphs

Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.

Data for this Contest was Contributed by on 2014-01-11

Map

Map

Adams	Kane	41.5%
	Freed	55.4%
	Other	3.1%

Allegheny	Kane	61.1%
	Freed	36.0%
	Other	2.9%

Armstrong	Kane	43.5%
	Freed	53.0%
	Other	3.5%

Beaver	Kane	54.1%
	Freed	42.4%
	Other	3.6%

Bedford	Kane	34.6%
	Freed	63.1%
	Other	2.2%

Berks	Kane	53.1%
	Freed	44.9%
	Other	2.0%

Blair	Kane	41.7%
	Freed	55.5%
	Other	2.8%

Bradford	Kane	40.6%
	Freed	56.2%
	Other	3.2%

Bucks	Kane	52.1%
	Freed	46.2%
	Other	1.6%

Butler	Kane	39.8%
	Freed	56.8%
	Other	3.4%

Cambria	Kane	56.9%
	Freed	39.8%
	Other	3.3%

Cameron	Kane	43.7%
	Freed	52.2%
	Other	4.1%

Carbon	Kane	53.2%
	Freed	43.8%
	Other	3.1%

Centre	Kane	56.3%
	Freed	39.5%
	Other	4.2%

Chester	Kane	50.3%
	Freed	47.1%
	Other	2.6%

Clarion	Kane	41.2%
	Freed	55.0%
	Other	3.9%

Clearfield	Kane	47.5%
	Freed	49.1%
	Other	3.5%

Clinton	Kane	53.1%
	Freed	43.7%
	Other	3.2%

Columbia	Kane	50.0%
	Freed	46.9%
	Other	3.1%

Crawford	Kane	41.5%
	Freed	54.4%
	Other	4.1%

Cumberland	Kane	40.4%
	Freed	56.9%
	Other	2.7%

Dauphin	Kane	54.7%
	Freed	43.7%
	Other	1.6%

Delaware	Kane	60.1%
	Freed	38.7%
	Other	1.2%

Elk	Kane	51.0%
	Freed	45.5%
	Other	3.5%

Erie	Kane	56.6%
	Freed	39.6%
	Other	3.8%

Fayette	Kane	57.8%
	Freed	39.6%
	Other	2.5%

Forest	Kane	46.4%
	Freed	49.6%
	Other	4.0%

Franklin	Kane	36.9%
	Freed	60.2%
	Other	2.9%

Fulton	Kane	28.2%
	Freed	68.6%
	Other	3.2%

Greene	Kane	55.1%
	Freed	41.9%
	Other	3.0%

Huntingdon	Kane	41.1%
	Freed	56.0%
	Other	3.0%

Indiana	Kane	47.9%
	Freed	48.7%
	Other	3.4%

Jefferson	Kane	38.5%
	Freed	58.0%
	Other	3.5%

Juniata	Kane	37.9%
	Freed	59.5%
	Other	2.6%

Lackawanna	Kane	72.1%
	Freed	25.7%
	Other	2.2%

Lancaster	Kane	43.5%
	Freed	54.2%
	Other	2.3%

Lawrence	Kane	51.7%
	Freed	45.6%
	Other	2.7%

Lebanon	Kane	40.4%
	Freed	57.0%
	Other	2.6%

Lehigh	Kane	56.1%
	Freed	41.5%
	Other	2.4%

Luzerne	Kane	59.5%
	Freed	37.3%
	Other	3.2%

Lycoming	Kane	40.8%
	Freed	56.2%
	Other	3.1%

McKean	Kane	37.7%
	Freed	59.3%
	Other	3.0%

Mercer	Kane	51.2%
	Freed	45.8%
	Other	3.1%

Mifflin	Kane	38.7%
	Freed	59.1%
	Other	2.3%

Monroe	Kane	58.3%
	Freed	39.9%
	Other	1.8%

Montgomery	Kane	57.8%
	Freed	41.1%
	Other	1.1%

Montour	Kane	46.0%
	Freed	50.9%
	Other	3.2%

Northampton	Kane	54.9%
	Freed	43.5%
	Other	1.6%

Northumberland	Kane	47.0%
	Freed	50.2%
	Other	2.8%

Perry	Kane	35.5%
	Freed	61.3%
	Other	3.2%

Philadelphia	Kane	86.2%
	Freed	13.0%
	Other	0.8%

Pike	Kane	44.3%
	Freed	52.9%
	Other	2.8%

Potter	Kane	30.3%
	Freed	66.5%
	Other	3.3%

Schuylkill	Kane	51.4%
	Freed	45.9%
	Other	2.7%

Snyder	Kane	36.8%
	Freed	60.3%
	Other	2.9%

Somerset	Kane	42.3%
	Freed	54.4%
	Other	3.3%

Sullivan	Kane	42.9%
	Freed	53.8%
	Other	3.3%

Susquehanna	Kane	44.9%
	Freed	51.7%
	Other	3.4%

Tioga	Kane	32.6%
	Freed	64.3%
	Other	3.1%

Union	Kane	41.8%
	Freed	55.5%
	Other	2.7%

Venango	Kane	42.5%
	Freed	53.3%
	Other	4.2%

Warren	Kane	41.9%
	Freed	53.7%
	Other	4.5%

Washington	Kane	51.4%
	Freed	45.5%
	Other	3.1%

Wayne	Kane	46.8%
	Freed	50.5%
	Other	2.7%

Westmoreland	Kane	47.7%
	Freed	49.6%
	Other	2.7%

Wyoming	Kane	47.4%
	Freed	49.3%
	Other	3.3%

York	Kane	43.6%
	Freed	53.4%
	Other	2.9%

National DataGraph for 2012 - Pennsylvania Results for 2012

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved